Which of the following is one of the options after the Investigative Committee receives evidence?

The correct option is related to the potential outcomes for an investigation once the Investigative Committee has evaluated the gathered evidence. After assessing the evidence, the committee has the authority to determine whether the evidence is sufficient to warrant further action. If they find that the evidence does not meet the threshold necessary to proceed, terminating the investigation for insufficient evidence is a logical and appropriate course of action.

This is a crucial step in maintaining the integrity of the investigative process, ensuring that individuals are not subjected to unwarranted scrutiny or actions based on inadequate or inconclusive evidence. This protects the rights of those involved and maintains the credibility of the committee's operations.

The other options involve actions that may or may not occur depending on the circumstances of the investigation but are not reflective of the step taken when evidence is assessed and deemed insufficient. For example, advising the investigated person or summoning them for a formal meeting would typically occur if the committee believes there is adequate evidence to discuss findings. Publishing findings to the public might be considered at a later stage but is not a direct response to the evidence evaluation process.